Outcomes

How admissions results look with a SAJU-supported application

Our approach focuses on measurable improvements: better fit and balanced school lists, optimal student positioning, tighter execution without confusion, and better budget-fit outcomes.

Case Stories

Student case stories

Dominic S.

Dominic S.

ChallengesResult
  • Perfect grades, no clear academic direction
  • Every future decision — university, essays, activities — resting on unstable ground
Academics: IB 40/45 predicted · top of class in Math and Physics · international school in Shanghai
Initial Profile: Strong academics with no answer to the simplest question — "what do you actually want to study?". Direction was missing, not ability.
Extracurriculars: Engaged across technical subjects, but with no strategic thread tying them to a major.
Changes Made: Mapped genuine interests (Industrial Engineering vs. Business Management); evaluated each path across market demand, academic fit, and flexibility; connected Dominic with working professionals in both fields so the choice was grounded in real-world understanding.
Outcome: Committed to Industrial Engineering with genuine clarity; secured offers from TU Delft and the University of Amsterdam.
Paul K.

Paul K.

ChallengesResult
  • Strong but interchangeable — nothing that made him stand out
  • A scattered list of activities with no unifying theme
Academics: IB 43/45 predicted · consistently strong across subjects
Initial Profile: "Excellent, but so is everyone else applying to competitive universities." A high-performing student with no distinguishing intellectual identity.
Extracurriculars: A wide range of activities accumulated without direction or strategy.
Changes Made: Identified behavioral economics as a central intellectual interest and rebuilt the profile around it; reframed existing experiences to support that narrative; launched a focused project — a social media account explaining real-world economic behavior to a younger audience.
Outcome: Received an offer from the London School of Economics with strong scholarship opportunities.
Bink M.

Bink M.

ChallengesResult
  • Family fixated on Oxford as the only acceptable outcome
  • No balanced list, no backup; budget required financial aid that was never guaranteed
Academics: A-Level student with high predicted grades in Economics and History
Initial Profile: All-in on a single target with no margin for error and no consideration of program-level fit.
Extracurriculars: Competitive profile for Oxford but not meaningfully differentiated.
Changes Made: Compared programs across the US, UK, and Europe by teaching style, program strengths, career outcomes, and cost; connected the family with current students and alumni to ground the decision in real experience; built a balanced list that kept Oxford alongside strong alternatives.
Other: Not admitted to Oxford — and that became a successful cycle, not a failed one.
Outcome: Offers from Sciences Po and the University of Amsterdam — both outstanding programs aligned with his interests and long-term goals.
Kexin P.

Kexin P.

ChallengesResult
  • Passive student — delayed decisions, missed opportunities
  • Overwhelmed parents managing the process themselves, with prior distrust of counseling agencies
Academics: Spanish Baccalaureate · consistently ranked at the very top of her program
Initial Profile: Strong academics and an international upbringing; already helping run the family business — well-positioned for competitive business programs, but not doing the consistent work to translate potential into results.
Extracurriculars: Co-managed the family business alongside her studies.
Changes Made: Mapped every university, requirement, and deadline transparently on our platform so Kexin could see what was done, in progress, and coming next; replaced ad-hoc parental oversight with periodic progress updates focused on decisions, not day-to-day management.
Other: Originally from Zhejiang; raised in Spain.
Outcome: Admitted to ESADE University for the Bachelor in Business and Artificial Intelligence.
Before & After

The difference professional SAJU guidance makes

Academic Direction

Before

Course selection lacks focus, making it difficult to build a coherent application narrative. Admissions officers see no clear academic direction.

After

A focused academic trajectory, supported by targeted extracurriculars and personal projects, presenting a clear and authentic academic path.

Profile Narrative

Before

A list of achievements without a cohesive story, resulting in an application that lacks personality and impact.

After

Background, experiences, and goals are seamlessly integrated into a compelling narrative that leaves a lasting impression.

Application Execution

Before

Conflicting information from multiple sources leads to confusion, disorganized execution, mounting pressure, and missed opportunities.

After

A clear, transparent strategy with defined milestones and quality control, ensuring every small detail is taken care of.

Your Turn

Start your application journey in three steps

1

Run the University Fit Assessment

Answer questions on academics, extracurriculars, achievements, current target school, and other preferences. Our algorithm generates a personalized university fit report.

2

Book your Initial Consultation

A 1:1 deep-dive with one of our experts. Understand your assessment results, profile gaps, and where your child stands relative to their targets.

3

Begin your Application Journey

Your counselor guides you through the entire process, following the SAJU framework to successfully achieve every milestone before deadlines.